People ex rel. De Moss v. Van Buren Circuit Judge
49 N.W. 924, 41 Mich. 725
Opinion
The party who prepared the bill of exceptions having done all in his power to comply with the various orders made for its settlement, -and having completed and furnished his bill in due time for that purpose, he cannot lawfully be deprived of his right to have it settled and signed, by any failure of the judge or of the opposing party to have it regularly completed at the time appointed. People v. Littlejohn, 11 Mich., 60.
Mandamus granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. De Moss v. Van Buren Circuit Judge, 49 N.W. 924, 41 Mich. 725 (Mich. 1879).
49 N.W. 924 (People ex rel. De Moss v. Van Buren Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Springfield v. Fulk
131 S.W. 694 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Kearney
46 S.W. 414 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1898)