People ex rel. Davidson v. Morhous
This text of 265 A.D. 892 (People ex rel. Davidson v. Morhous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Subsequently the maximum punishment for this offense was reduced to ten years’ imprisonment (Penal Law, § 1308; Cons. Laws, ch. 40; amd. by L. 1940, eh. 443), but the amendment to the statute was not made retroactive. Appellant’s sole contention is that he should be resentenced and his term reduced as a matter of discretion. The original sentence was proper, in fact mandatory, and under such circumstances this court has no power to reduce the sentence upon appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding. Upon appeal from a judgment of conviction a reduction might be made, but not otherwise. (Code Crim. Pro., § 543; People v. Spagnolia, 260 App. Div. 551.) Order appealed from affirmed without costs. Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 892, 37 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-davidson-v-morhous-nyappdiv-1942.