People ex rel. D'Adamo v. Artus
This text of 61 A.D.3d 1263 (People ex rel. D'Adamo v. Artus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered September 18, 2008 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 70 proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus, contending that he is being illegally held due to the Division of Parole’s failure to assist with and/or approve housing necessary to facilitate his conditional release. Supreme Court refused to issue the writ and denied petitioner’s application without a hearing. Petitioner now appeals.
We affirm. Entitlement to immediate release from prison, which does not occur until the expiration of an inmate’s sentence, is a prerequisite for habeas corpus relief (see People ex rel. Porter v Napoli, 56 AD3d 830, 831 [2008]). Because petitioner is not entitled to any such immediate release in this case, Supreme Court properly denied petitioner’s application (see People ex rel. Land v State of New York, 54 AD3d 1113 [2008]; People ex rel. Sansalone v Schriver, 252 AD2d 605 [1998]).
[1264]*1264Cardona, P.J., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 A.D.3d 1263, 876 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-dadamo-v-artus-nyappdiv-2009.