People ex rel. Cuvillier v. Hagarty

209 A.D. 832
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 209 A.D. 832 (People ex rel. Cuvillier v. Hagarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Cuvillier v. Hagarty, 209 A.D. 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Motion for prohibition order denied, without costs. The issuance of a prohibition order is justified only by extreme necessity when the grievance cannot be redressed by ordinary proceedings at law in equity, or by appeal. (People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt, 186 N. Y. 383.) The court at Trial Term has the power and jurisdiction [833]*833to determine the validity of the defense set up in the libel suit, as to whether or not the defendant in that suit was performing a legislative duty in sending the telegram, the subject of complaint, and also to determine whether the defendant was entitled to immunity under article 3, section 12, of the Constitution. Kelly, P. J., Jayeox, Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Arbitration between Board of Education & Buffalo Council of Supervisors & Administrators
52 A.D.2d 220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Defazio v. Oneida County Court
140 Misc. 487 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D. 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cuvillier-v-hagarty-nyappdiv-1924.