People Ex Rel. Cuvillier v. . Hagarty

144 N.E. 917, 238 N.Y. 621, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 803
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 1924·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from order dismissed, with costs. The writ of prohibition does not issue as a matter of right but in the sound discretion of the court. (People ex rel, Hummel v. Trial Term, 184 N. Y. 30; People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt, 186 N. Y. 383, 393.) “ It being discretionary with the Supreme Court whether to grant or deny the writ, its order refusing to grant it is not appealable to this court ” (People ex rel. Adams v. Westbrook, 89 N. Y. 152, 156), unless as in People ex rel. Hummel v. Trial Term, the order or the opinion of that court shows that the application was denied as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People Ex Rel. Cuvillier v. . Hagarty, 144 N.E. 917, 238 N.Y. 621, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 803 (N.Y. 1924).

144 N.E. 917 (People Ex Rel. Cuvillier v. . Hagarty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Arbitration between Board of Education & Buffalo Council of Supervisors & Administrators
52 A.D.2d 220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Kilgallon v. City Council of Troy
86 Misc. 106 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Drug Research Corp. v. Justices of Court of Special Sessions
36 Misc. 2d 23 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
State ex rel. Aho v. Justice Court
313 P.2d 542 (Montana Supreme Court, 1957)
Gleason v. Mullen
204 Misc. 450 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Public Service Commission v. Norton
109 N.E.2d 705 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Matter of Baltimore Mail S.S. Co. v. Fawcett
199 N.E. 628 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Matter of Culver Contrg. Corp. v. Humphrey
196 N.E. 627 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)