People ex. rel. Cuthbert v. Common Council of Detroit

18 Mich. 338, 1869 Mich. LEXIS 118
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 1869·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

The Court held that mandamus was not a proper proceeding to try the right to a public office, and declined to make an order to show cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex. rel. Cuthbert v. Common Council of Detroit, 18 Mich. 338, 1869 Mich. LEXIS 118 (Mich. 1869).

18 Mich. 338 (People ex. rel. Cuthbert v. Common Council of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carpenter v. Clark
185 N.W. 868 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)
Gildemeister v. Lindsay
180 N.W. 633 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Harrington v. Otsego Circuit Judge
169 N.W. 888 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)
Lachance v. Board of Canvassers
122 N.W. 271 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)
Kline v. McKelvey
49 S.E. 896 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1905)
Hartwig v. Mayor of Manistee
96 N.W. 1067 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)
Ashwell v. Bullock
81 N.W. 577 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1900)
Henderson v. Glynn
2 Colo. App. 303 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1892)
Biggs v. McBride
5 L.R.A. 115 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1889)
People ex rel. Gaige v. Reardon
3 N.Y.S. 560 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
French v. Cowan
10 A. 335 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1887)
Leigh v. State ex rel. O'Bannon
69 Ala. 261 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)
Knight v. Ferris
11 Del. 283 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1881)
Hildreth v. Heath
1 Ill. App. 82 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1878)
Duane v. McDonald
41 Conn. 517 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1874)