People ex rel. Curman v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Curman v. Murphy

7 A.D.2d 894, 182 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10269

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 894 (People ex rel. Curman v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Curman v. Murphy, 7 A.D.2d 894, 182 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. (See People ex rel. Sheehan v. Murphy (7 A D 2d 889.) All concur, except Halpem, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for remission for further hearing for the reasons stated in dissenting opinion in People ex rel. Sheehan v. Murphy (supra). (Appeal from an order of Cayuga Special Term, sustaining the writ of habeas corpus and directing relator’s return to the County Court of Kings County for vacation of a sentence imposed October 19, 1943, rearraignment for sentence upon his conviction for murder, second degree, and the imposition of sentence.) Present — MeCum, P. J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpem, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. (See People ex rel. Sheehan v. Murphy (7 A D 2d 889.) All concur, except Halpem, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for remission for further hearing for the reasons stated in dissenting opinion in People ex rel. Sheehan v. Murphy (supra). (Appeal from an order of Cayuga Special Term, sustaining the writ of habeas corpus and directing relator’s return to the County Court of Kings County for vacation of a sentence imposed October 19, 1943, rearraignment for sentence upon his conviction for murder, second degree, and the imposition of sentence.) Present — MeCum, P. J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpem, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 894, 182 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-curman-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1959.