People ex rel. Cunningham v. McNeill
281 A.D. 845, 119 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3505
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 1953·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dismissing writ of habeas corpus affirmed, without costs. The order of commitment is valid on its face. This disposition is without prejudice to an application by the relator, if so advised, to vacate and set aside the order of commitment on the ground that he was not represented by counsel at the time that it was made. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Cunningham v. McNeill, 281 A.D. 845, 119 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).
281 A.D. 845 (People ex rel. Cunningham v. McNeill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Van Newkirk v. McNeill
286 A.D. 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
People v. Cunningham
2 Misc. 2d 162 (New York County Courts, 1954)