People ex rel. Cunningham v. Duncan

1 Johns. 311
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

This court, if they see that the right of suing on the administration bond is abused, will interfere,- and set aside the proceedings. Here one surety on the bond, brings an action against his co-surety, for an alleged default in the administrator, before he, or either of them has been damnified in any way, as surety. No suit will lie at law, at the instance of a co-surety in such a case.

The proceedings must be set aside, with costs.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Cunningham v. Duncan, 1 Johns. 311 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

1 Johns. 311 (People ex rel. Cunningham v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leland v. Tousey
6 Hill & Den. 328 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)