People ex rel. Cunningham v. Duncan

1 Johns. 311
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Johns. 311 (People ex rel. Cunningham v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Cunningham v. Duncan, 1 Johns. 311 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This court, if they see that the right of suing on the administration bond is abused, will interfere,- and set aside the proceedings. Here one surety on the bond, brings an action against his co-surety, for an alleged default in the administrator, before he, or either of them has been damnified in any way, as surety. No suit will lie at law, at the instance of a co-surety in such a case.

The proceedings must be set aside, with costs.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leland v. Tousey
6 Hill & Den. 328 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cunningham-v-duncan-nysupct-1806.