People ex rel. Cunningham v. Brennan

18 Abb. Pr. 100
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1864·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

J. F. Barnard, J.

The Common Council may waive, I think, the time for the performance of a contract. It would be a hard rule of construction which would prevent a party to a contract from waiving a penalty incurred by non-performance at the day named, no matter how controlling the reason and excuse may be for non-performance.

The fatal defect to this writ is that the bill has not been audited by the “ Department of Finances.” This department must certify the claim to the comptroller. Until that is done the comptroller’s duty is plain and imperative. The Common Council cannot audit and allow claims. The Finance Department only can. If they refuse to" allow and audit a just claim, they are the proper parties to proceed against by mandamus.

Motion to dismiss writ of mandamus granted, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Cunningham v. Brennan, 18 Abb. Pr. 100 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1864).

18 Abb. Pr. 100 (People ex rel. Cunningham v. Brennan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. Angell
33 A. 406 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1895)
Kingsley v. City of Brooklyn
5 Abb. N. Cas. 1 (New York City Court, 1878)