People ex rel. Cram v. Redlands High School District

62 Cal. App. 796
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 2, 1923
DocketCiv. No. 4109
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cal. App. 796 (People ex rel. Cram v. Redlands High School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Cram v. Redlands High School District, 62 Cal. App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

HOUSER, J.

The facts in this case are identical with the facts as stated in the case of People ex rel. Thompson v. San Bernardino High School Dist. et al., ante, p. 67 [216 Pac. 959], and the same points are raised in each of the cases. Upon the authority of People ex rel. Thompson V. San Bernardino Sigh School Dist., the judgment herein is affirmed.

Conrey, P. J., concurred.

Curtis, J., being disqualified, did not participate in the foregoing opinion.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 29, 1923'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. San Bernardino High School District
216 P. 959 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Cal. App. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cram-v-redlands-high-school-district-calctapp-1923.