People ex rel. Cotton v. Leo
194 A.D. 921
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 194 A.D. 921 (People ex rel. Cotton v. Leo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People ex rel. Cotton v. Leo, 194 A.D. 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinion
As the action of the board was quasi-judicial, we think that the order should be modified by striking out the provision as to costs, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Arbitration between Shand & Aetna Insurance
74 A.D.2d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Orange County Publications Division of Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. v. Council of Newburgh
89 Misc. 2d 847 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
Melita v. Nolan
126 Misc. 345 (New York Supreme Court, 1926)
People ex rel. Swedish Hospital in Brooklyn v. Leo
120 Misc. 355 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 A.D. 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cotton-v-leo-nyappdiv-1920.