People ex rel. Cotton v. Leo
194 A.D. 921
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1920·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
As the action of the board was quasi-judicial, we think that the order should be modified by striking out the provision as to costs, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Cotton v. Leo, 194 A.D. 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
194 A.D. 921 (People ex rel. Cotton v. Leo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Arbitration between Shand & Aetna Insurance
74 A.D.2d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Orange County Publications Division of Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. v. Council of Newburgh
89 Misc. 2d 847 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
Melita v. Nolan
126 Misc. 345 (New York Supreme Court, 1926)
People ex rel. Swedish Hospital in Brooklyn v. Leo
120 Misc. 355 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)