People ex rel. Cortez v. Wilmot

61 A.D.2d 1082, 403 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10768

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered April 22,1977 in Chemung County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. The issue is whether the New York State Board of Parole may add delinquent reformatory time to a subsequent maximum expiration date imposed for a crime committed while on parole. The Court of Appeals in Matter of Balmer v New York State Bd. of Parole (42 NY2d 939) found that such an addition of reformatory time would violate a convict’s right to due process. We reached a similar result in Matter of Dixon v Chairman, N. Y. State Bd. of Parole (58 AD2d 933). Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Cortez v. Wilmot, 61 A.D.2d 1082, 403 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

61 A.D.2d 1082 (People ex rel. Cortez v. Wilmot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Balmer v. New York State Board of Parole
366 N.E.2d 1363 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Dixon v. Chairman of New York State Board of Parole
58 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)