People ex rel. Corscadden v. Howe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Corscadden v. Howe

84 N.Y.S. 604

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 604 (People ex rel. Corscadden v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Corscadden v. Howe, 84 N.Y.S. 604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, J.

We see no ground for this appeal. The relator has acted and is acting as superintendent of the penitentiary under a salary prescribed by statute, to which he is clearly entitled. He has not been removed by the commission, and, if the right of the commission to remove him be assumed for the argument, until he is removed he is entitled to full for services rendered.

The order should therefore be affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, J.

We see no ground for this appeal. The relator has acted and is acting as superintendent of the penitentiary under a salary prescribed by statute, to which he is clearly entitled. He has not been removed by the commission, and, if the right of the commission to remove him be assumed for the argument, until he is removed he is entitled to full for services rendered.

The order should therefore be affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-corscadden-v-howe-nyappdiv-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack