People ex rel. Conyers v. Dalsheim
This text of 148 A.D.2d 649 (People ex rel. Conyers v. Dalsheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Owen, J.), entered September 14, 1987, which dismissed the writ.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is therefore granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 A.D.2d 649, 540 N.Y.S.2d 201, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-conyers-v-dalsheim-nyappdiv-1989.