People, ex rel. Comter v. Reed

5 Denio 554
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1848·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Whittlesey, J.

To give the officer jurisdiction, the petitioners must have been either 1, committed after their arrest under the act; or 2, have given the bond specified in the fourth subdivision of the tenth section of the act; or 3, have had a suit commenced against them in a court of record, in which by the provisions of the act they could not be imprisoned. (Sess. Laws, 1831, p.399, §. 12.) The application here was probably on the ground of having given the bond mentioned in the fourth subdivision of section tenth. The petition states that a bond pursuant to the 10th section had been given. But the tenth section makes mention of two bonds; one in the 4th subdivision, with a condition to apply for an assignment and discharge, and one in the 5th subdivision, conditioned that he will not remove his property. It is only the giving the bond specified in the 4th subdivision, that confers jurisdiction, and it is not stated in the petition, and we do not know that such a bond had been given. There is therefore, not enough to show that the officer acquired jurisdiction. (People v. Abel, 3 Hill, 109.)

Proceedings reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People, ex rel. Comter v. Reed, 5 Denio 554 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1848).

5 Denio 554 (People, ex rel. Comter v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scudder v. Trenton Saving Fund Society
43 A. 3 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1899)
Tweed v. Guild
11 P. 753 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1886)
People Ex Rel. Haines v. Smith
45 N.Y. 772 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)
People ex rel. Gambling v. Board of Police
6 Abb. Pr. 162 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)