People ex rel. Coates v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Coates v. Martin

8 A.D.2d 688, 184 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9252

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 9, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 8 A.D.2d 688 (People ex rel. Coates v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Coates v. Martin, 8 A.D.2d 688, 184 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The petitioner-respondent had been sentenced on March 31, 1954 as a second felony offender by the Kings County Court to an indeterminate term of from two and one-half years to five years. On April 20, 1954 he was brought back from Sing Sing Prison and taken to Nassau County Court for trial on another indictment, charging him with the felony of criminally possessing a pistol after having been previously convicted of a crime, in violation of subdivision 4 of section 1897 of the Penal Law. He pleaded guilty on November 19, 1954 and he was sentenced on December 17, 1954 to an indeterminate term of from three and one-half years to seven years. (This was the shortest sentence which it was permissible for the court to impose, under sections 1935 and 1941 of the Penal Law.) The petitioner, in the meantime, had spent 242 days in the Nassau County Jail. In imposing sentence, the Nassau County Judge ordered that the sentence be served “with credit for time served in the Nassau County Jail, and concurrent as nearly as possible with sentence imposed in Kings County on March 31, 1954.” This sentence was improper. The petitioner, throughout the period of his incarceration in the County Jail, was under the Kings County sentence, and was not being held solely by reason óf the pendency of the Nassau County charge for which he was ultimately sentenced. Hence section 2193 of the Penal Law was not applicable. The petitioner received full credit on his Kings County sentence for the time he spent in the Nassau County Jail. Nevertheless, the Warden had no right to refuse to give the petitioner credit for 242 days upon the Nassau County sentence, as directed by the court. Prison officials are bound by the terms of the commitment papers and they cannot add to or detract therefrom (People ex rel. Jackson v. Weaver, 279 App. Div. 88; People ex rel. Hand v. Prison Board, 191 App. Div. 127). The error in the' sentence must be corrected by appropriate judicial proceedings in the sentencing court (Matter of Donohue v. Brown, 3 Misc 2d 969). All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term directing the Warden of Attica Prison to credit relator with 242 days of jail time.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Halpern, JJ. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The petitioner-respondent had been sentenced on March 31, 1954 as a second felony offender by the Kings County Court to an indeterminate term of from two and one-half years to five years. On April 20, 1954 he was brought back from Sing Sing Prison and taken to Nassau County Court for trial on another indictment, charging him with the felony of criminally possessing a pistol after having been previously convicted of a crime, in violation of subdivision 4 of section 1897 of the Penal Law. He pleaded guilty on November 19, 1954 and he was sentenced on December 17, 1954 to an indeterminate term of from three and one-half years to seven years. (This was the shortest sentence which it was permissible for the court to impose, under sections 1935 and 1941 of the Penal Law.) The petitioner, in the meantime, had spent 242 days in the Nassau County Jail. In imposing sentence, the Nassau County Judge ordered that the sentence be served “with credit for time served in the Nassau County Jail, and concurrent as nearly as possible with sentence imposed in Kings County on March 31, 1954.” This sentence was improper. The petitioner, throughout the period of his incarceration in the County Jail, was under the Kings County sentence, and was not being held solely by reason óf the pendency of the Nassau County charge for which he was ultimately sentenced. Hence section 2193 of the Penal Law was not applicable. The petitioner received full credit on his Kings County sentence for the time he spent in the Nassau County Jail. Nevertheless, the Warden had no right to refuse to give the petitioner credit for 242 days upon the Nassau County sentence, as directed by the court. Prison officials are bound by the terms of the commitment papers and they cannot add to or detract therefrom (People ex rel. Jackson v. Weaver, 279 App. Div. 88; People ex rel. Hand v. Prison Board, 191 App. Div. 127). The error in the' sentence must be corrected by appropriate judicial proceedings in the sentencing court (Matter of Donohue v. Brown, 3 Misc 2d 969). All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term directing the Warden of Attica Prison to credit relator with 242 days of jail time.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Halpern, JJ. •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 688, 184 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-coates-v-martin-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack