People ex rel. Clancy v. Bingham

123 A.D. 226, 107 N.Y.S. 1063, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 33
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 123 A.D. 226 (People ex rel. Clancy v. Bingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Clancy v. Bingham, 123 A.D. 226, 107 N.Y.S. 1063, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 33 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The relator, a member of the police force detailed as a member of the tenement house squad, was charged with having* assaulted and insulted a young colored woman, and after a trial was convicted and dismissed from the force. It is alleged in the petition and not denied by the return that the relator was given less than forty-eight hours’ notice of trial, the notice having been servéd on him at on e-thirty-five p. m. on February twenty-sixth to appear for trial at ten a. m. on February twenty-eighth, thus giving him only forty-four and one-half hours’ notice. The rule of the department (36g) requires that notice of trial shall be served not less than forty-eight hours before the hour of trial, exclusive of Sundays," legal holidays and, half-holidays. The defendant when arraigned for trial asked for an adjournment, which was denied. The failure to give-sufficient notice was fatal to the validity of the proceedings, and the writ must be sustained, the determination of the respondent annulled and the relator reinstated,- with fifty dollars costs.

Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Lahghlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

Proceedings annulled and relator reinstated, - with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawson v. Cornelius
35 Misc. 2d 816 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
People ex rel. McCarthy v. Bingham
135 A.D. 351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
People ex rel. Mencke v. Bingham
115 N.Y.S. 1139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 A.D. 226, 107 N.Y.S. 1063, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-clancy-v-bingham-nyappdiv-1908.