People ex rel. Charnick v. Warden of Anna M. Cross Center
This text of 176 A.D.2d 638 (People ex rel. Charnick v. Warden of Anna M. Cross Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal from order and judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Burton Hecht, J.), entered on July 2 and September 7, 1990, respectively, which denied and dismissed the petition seeking habeas corpus relief, unanimously dismissed, without costs, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
Relator’s attorney advises this court that relator cannot be located. Further, it appears that the Department of Probation has obtained, or will obtain, a new parole violation warrant against the relator. Under these circumstances, relator’s appeal of the order and judgment denying his petition must be dismissed, as relator is no longer subject to the mandate of the [639]*639court. (People v Sullivan, 28 NY2d 900.) If we were not dismissing the appeal on this ground, we would dismiss on the ground that the appeal is moot, since relator is no longer in the custody of the State. (People ex rel. Hall v Casscles, 38 NY2d 1006.) Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D.2d 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-charnick-v-warden-of-anna-m-cross-center-nyappdiv-1991.