People ex rel. Chapman v. Pratt
14 Mich. 333, 1866 Mich. LEXIS 41
Opinion
This was an information in the nature of a quo warranto. Notice of hearing was given by the relator.
The court held that the Attorney General having control of the information, notice of hearing on behalf of the prosecution must proceed from him, and the cause was therefore stricken off for the term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Chapman v. Pratt, 14 Mich. 333, 1866 Mich. LEXIS 41 (Mich. 1866).
14 Mich. 333 (People ex rel. Chapman v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frey v. Michie
36 N.W. 184 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1888)