People ex rel. Chapman v. Fay

25 A.D.2d 665

This text of 25 A.D.2d 665 (People ex rel. Chapman v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Chapman v. Fay, 25 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding', relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered November 24, 1964, which dismissed the writ and remanded him to the custody of respondent. Relator contends that his conviction as a prior felony offender in 1963 was illegal because section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not complied with when he was sentenced on a 1953 felony conviction. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The record establishes that section 480 was duly complied with at the sentencing in 1953 when the statutory inquiry was addressed to the relator and his attorney responded on his behalf in his presence (People ex rel. Kaminsky v. Silberglitt, 30 Misc 2d 813, affd. 15 A D 2d 751, stay denied 11 N Y 2d 798; People v. Kadin, 23 A D 2d 699).

Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Kaminsky v. Silberglitt
30 Misc. 2d 813 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.D.2d 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-chapman-v-fay-nyappdiv-1966.