People ex rel. Chang v. Lou

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Chang v. Lou

260 A.D. 857, 23 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5055

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 857 (People ex rel. Chang v. Lou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Chang v. Lou, 260 A.D. 857, 23 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ. i President and Directors of The Manhattan Company, as Successor to American Trust Company, as Trustee under a Certain Mortgage or Deed of Trust, Bearing Date as of the 1st Day of May, 1924, Made by 251 West 71st Street, Inc., Appellant, Respondent, v. 251 West 71st Street, Inc., Respondent, Appellant; Rae Ranzal, Respondent, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent Rae Ranzal against the plaintiff-appellant. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ. i President and Directors of The Manhattan Company, as Successor to American Trust Company, as Trustee under a Certain Mortgage or Deed of Trust, Bearing Date as of the 1st Day of May, 1924, Made by 251 West 71st Street, Inc., Appellant, Respondent, v. 251 West 71st Street, Inc., Respondent, Appellant; Rae Ranzal, Respondent, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent Rae Ranzal against the plaintiff-appellant. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 857, 23 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-chang-v-lou-nyappdiv-1940.