People ex rel. Central Stamping Co. v. Barker

New York Supreme Court

People ex rel. Central Stamping Co. v. Barker

33 N.Y.S. 190, 86 Hun 240, 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 240, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 864

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedApril 11, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 N.Y.S. 190 (People ex rel. Central Stamping Co. v. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Central Stamping Co. v. Barker, 33 N.Y.S. 190, 86 Hun 240, 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 240, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 864 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is conceded that, after the assessment books •were opened for correction and review, the relator applied for a ■reduction of the assessment made against it, which was granted by the tax commissioners, and the assessment reduced from $500,000 to $221,153. Subsequently, and without notice, and upon evidence satisfactory to them, the assessment was increased to $357,468.13. This, we think, was error, because, having corrected the assessment, they were without authority to thereafter increase is, except upon 20 days’ notice to the relator. Laws 1882, c. 410, § 819.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is conceded that, after the assessment books •were opened for correction and review, the relator applied for a ■reduction of the assessment made against it, which was granted by the tax commissioners, and the assessment reduced from $500,000 to $221,153. Subsequently, and without notice, and upon evidence satisfactory to them, the assessment was increased to $357,468.13. This, we think, was error, because, having corrected the assessment, they were without authority to thereafter increase is, except upon 20 days’ notice to the relator. Laws 1882, c. 410, § 819.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.Y.S. 190, 86 Hun 240, 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 240, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-central-stamping-co-v-barker-nysupct-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack