People ex rel. Cedeno v. Schiraldi
This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 05068 (People ex rel. Cedeno v. Schiraldi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People ex rel. Cedeno v Schiraldi |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 05068 |
| Decided on September 24, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on September 24, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.
2021-06667
v
Vincent Schiraldi, etc., respondent.
Vivian R. Cedeno, Bayside, NY, petitioner pro se.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott, and Hannah X. Scotti of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to set reasonable bail concerning Tyheem Valles upon Queens County Indictment No. 881/2021.
ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).
MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Acting Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 NY Slip Op 05068, 197 A.D.3d 1273, 151 N.Y.S.3d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cedeno-v-schiraldi-nyappdiv-2021.