People ex rel. Catterson v. Barahal
This text of 30 A.D.2d 692 (People ex rel. Catterson v. Barahal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by relator from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 24, 1967, which dismissed the writ of habeas corpus herein. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term (1) for a hearing de novo at which relator shall be represented by assigned counsel and (2) for the appointment of an independent [693]*693psychiatrist to examine relator and testify at the hearing as to her condition. (People ex rel. Rogers v. Stanley, 17 N Y 2d 256, 259; Matter of Patterson, 50 Misc 2d 730, 732; Judiciary Law, § 35, subds. 1, 3.) Findings of fact below, if any, have not been affirmed. Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.2d 692, 292 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-catterson-v-barahal-nyappdiv-1968.