People ex rel. Cathcart v. Treasurer

38 Mich. 243, 1 McGrath 1408, 38 McGrath 243, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 42
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 22, 1878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In answer to an order to show.cause why he should not be compelled to pay certain ditch •orders, respondent showed there was no money in the fund on which they were drawn, and that the collection of the assessment had been judicially restrained as illegal.

Held, That such orders were not general township charges, and that although the assessment was payable into the town treasury, it still remained a separate fund, and that such orders could only be paid out of the particular assessment on the credit of which they were drawn. 1 Comp. L., § 1795, provides expressly for the keeping of such funds separate?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Cathcart v. Treasurer, 38 Mich. 243, 1 McGrath 1408, 38 McGrath 243, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 42 (Mich. 1878).

38 Mich. 243 (People ex rel. Cathcart v. Treasurer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDermott v. Alger
152 N.W. 991 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1915)