People ex rel. Cass v. Khahaifa
This text of 89 A.D.3d 1517 (People ex rel. Cass v. Khahaifa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent appeals from an order granting the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We note at the outset [1518]*1518that the order was subsumed in the final judgment, from which no appeal was taken. Nevertheless, we exercise our discretion to treat the notice of appeal as valid and deem the appeal as taken from the judgment (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; see also CPLR 5520 [c]), and we reverse. Petitioner was not entitled to habeas corpus relief because he violated a condition of postrelease supervision, which was properly imposed before petitioner completed the originally imposed sentence of imprisonment (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 629-633 [2011]). Present — Fahey, J.E, Garni, Sconiers, Gorski and Martoche, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.3d 1517, 932 N.Y.2d 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cass-v-khahaifa-nyappdiv-2011.