People ex rel. Carubia v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Carubia v. Fay

13 A.D.2d 665, 215 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11675

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 665 (People ex rel. Carubia v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Carubia v. Fay, 13 A.D.2d 665, 215 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy [666]*666on the Attorney-General. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the September Term, beginning September 6, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order dismissing, without a hearing, appellant’s habeas corpus proceeding. Appellant, therefore, either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of the contents of sneh papers. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy [666]*666on the Attorney-General. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the September Term, beginning September 6, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order dismissing, without a hearing, appellant’s habeas corpus proceeding. Appellant, therefore, either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of the contents of sneh papers. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 665, 215 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-carubia-v-fay-nyappdiv-1961.