People ex rel. Carter v. Sullivan

145 A.D.2d 451

This text of 145 A.D.2d 451 (People ex rel. Carter v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Carter v. Sullivan, 145 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), entered January 14, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the Hearing Officer did not abuse his discretion in denying the petitioner’s application for the assistance of counsel at the preliminary parole revocation hearing (see, People ex rel. Calloway v Skinner, 33 NY2d 23).

In addition, we find that the petitioner’s admission to his parole officers that he used cocaine in violation of the terms of his parole was properly introduced into evidence at the petitioner’s final parole revocation hearing (see, People v Ronald W., 24 NY2d 732).

We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Lawrence, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ronald W.(Anonymous)
249 N.E.2d 882 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Calloway v. Skinner
300 N.E.2d 716 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 A.D.2d 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-carter-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-1988.