People ex rel. Carter v. Smith

134 A.D.3d 1338, 20 N.Y.S.3d 920
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 17, 2015
Docket520859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 A.D.3d 1338 (People ex rel. Carter v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Carter v. Smith, 134 A.D.3d 1338, 20 N.Y.S.3d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Elliott, J.), entered March 18, 2015 in Greene County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner was sentenced to 3V2 years in prison following his 2002 conviction of robbery in the second degree. * In 2007, petitioner was sentenced to a prison term of 13 years and five years of postrelease supervision following his conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 70 proceeding for habeas corpus relief asserting that, because he served three years of an illegally imposed period of postrelease supervision in connection with the 2002 conviction, his due process rights were violated and he is entitled to immediate release. Supreme Court dismissed the petition without a hearing and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. “Entitlement to immediate release from prison, which does not occur until the expiration of an inmate’s sentence, is a prerequisite for habeas corpus relief” (People ex rel. Justice v Racette, 111 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 861 [2014] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see People ex rel. Porter v Napoli, 56 AD3d 830, 831 *1339 [2008]). Petitioner is currently serving the unexpired term of his 2007 sentence, which is completely unrelated to his 2002 sentence. As such, petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release and, therefore, a writ of habeas corpus cannot be granted (see People ex rel. Vickery v Griffin, 125 AD3d 1018, 1019 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 908 [2015]; People ex rel. Justice v Racette, 111 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 861 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

*

Petitioner was resentenced in 2012 to the same 3V2-year prison term but the five-year period of postrelease supervision that was administratively imposed by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision was removed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. D'Amico v. Lilley
2017 NY Slip Op 6574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.3d 1338, 20 N.Y.S.3d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-carter-v-smith-nyappdiv-2015.