People ex rel. Carter v. Miller

261 A.D.2d 674, 691 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4704
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 6, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 261 A.D.2d 674 (People ex rel. Carter v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Carter v. Miller, 261 A.D.2d 674, 691 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Donohue, J.), entered April 10, 1998 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding con[675]*675tending, inter alia, that he was denied due process because the original felony complaint was not dismissed before he was tried on the indictment, he was denied the right to testify before the Grand Jury and the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment of conviction. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm.

Because petitioner’s claims were or could have been raised in his direct appeal or in his CPL article 440 motions, habeas corpus relief is unavailable in this case (see, People ex rel. Moore v Miller, 244 AD2d 735, lv denied 91 NY2d 808). Furthermore, we find no extraordinary circumstances to warrant a departure from traditional orderly procedure. In any event, even if the issues raised by petitioner were meritorious, habeas corpus relief would be inappropriate inasmuch as he would not be entitled to immediate release (see generally, People ex rel. Merriweather v Miller, 243 AD2d 872, lv denied 91 NY2d 804).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Bennett
45 A.D.3d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People ex rel. Lee v. Cunningham
28 A.D.3d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People ex rel. Woodard v. Senkowski
305 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People ex rel. Walsh v. Sabourin
305 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People ex rel. Reyes v. State of New York Department of Correctional Services
288 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Lebron v. Herbert
287 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People ex rel. Murray v. Goord
268 A.D.2d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D.2d 674, 691 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-carter-v-miller-nyappdiv-1999.