People ex rel. Carr v. Martin
261 A.D. 865, 24 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7820
Opinion
Appeal by relator from an order denying his application to be released on the return of a writ of habeas corpus. It appears that he was convicted of the crime of grand larceny for having stolen two rings from his wife. A husband may not be convicted for larceny from his wife. (Caplan v. Caplan, 268 N. Y. 445; Allen v. Allen, 246 id. 571; Schultz v. Schultz, 89 id. 644.) Order reversed, writ sustained and prisoner discharged, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenek and Foster, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Carr v. Martin, 261 A.D. 865, 24 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
261 A.D. 865 (People ex rel. Carr v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caplan v. Caplan
198 N.E. 23 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)