People ex rel. Carlat v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Carlat v. Fay

27 A.D.2d 839, 278 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4726

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 839 (People ex rel. Carlat v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Carlat v. Fay, 27 A.D.2d 839, 278 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 25, 1966, which dismissed the writ and remanded him to respondent’s custody. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs; writ sustained; judgment of conviction rendered September 16, 1960 by the County Court, Nassau County, vacated; and action remanded to said County Court for the purpose of permitting relator (as defendant) to plead de novo to the indictment. The record discloses that relator was not given the warning required under section 335-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure when he pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree. Such failure renders the conviction void and amenable to collateral attack by way of habeas corpus (People ex rel. Bianchi v. La Vallee, 17 N Y 2d 818; People ex rel. Manning v. Fay, 16 N Y 2d 1061; People ex rel. Blair v. Fay, 26 A D 2d 669; People ex rel. Russo v. Fay, 25 A D 2d 779). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 25, 1966, which dismissed the writ and remanded him to respondent’s custody. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs; writ sustained; judgment of conviction rendered September 16, 1960 by the County Court, Nassau County, vacated; and action remanded to said County Court for the purpose of permitting relator (as defendant) to plead de novo to the indictment. The record discloses that relator was not given the warning required under section 335-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure when he pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree. Such failure renders the conviction void and amenable to collateral attack by way of habeas corpus (People ex rel. Bianchi v. La Vallee, 17 N Y 2d 818; People ex rel. Manning v. Fay, 16 N Y 2d 1061; People ex rel. Blair v. Fay, 26 A D 2d 669; People ex rel. Russo v. Fay, 25 A D 2d 779). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 839, 278 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-carlat-v-fay-nyappdiv-1967.