People ex rel. Carey v. Dieringer

Illinois Supreme Court

People ex rel. Carey v. Dieringer

372 N.E.2d 650, 69 Ill. 2d 391, 14 Ill. Dec. 454, 1978 Ill. LEXIS 209

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 13, 1978

DocketNo. 50304

StatusPublished

This text of 372 N.E.2d 650 (People ex rel. Carey v. Dieringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Carey v. Dieringer, 372 N.E.2d 650, 69 Ill. 2d 391, 14 Ill. Dec. 454, 1978 Ill. LEXIS 209 (Ill. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The motion by petitioner for leave to file a petition for an original writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied.

Following certification by the trial court under Supreme Court Rule 308 (58 Ill. 2d R. 308), the appellate court granted leave to appeal from an order denying a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena. That rule has no application in such a case, and the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal. In the exercise of this court’s supervisory jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Appellate Court, First District, vacate its order in case No. 77 — 1508 allowing leave to appeal, and it is further ordered that the court shall dismiss said appeal.

The motion by petitioner for a stay of proceedings in case No. 77 — 1508, in the Appellate Court, First District, pending disposition of motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied.

Supervisory order entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The motion by petitioner for leave to file a petition for an original writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied.

Following certification by the trial court under Supreme Court Rule 308 (58 Ill. 2d R. 308), the appellate court granted leave to appeal from an order denying a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena. That rule has no application in such a case, and the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal. In the exercise of this court’s supervisory jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Appellate Court, First District, vacate its order in case No. 77 — 1508 allowing leave to appeal, and it is further ordered that the court shall dismiss said appeal.

The motion by petitioner for a stay of proceedings in case No. 77 — 1508, in the Appellate Court, First District, pending disposition of motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied.

Supervisory order entered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

372 N.E.2d 650, 69 Ill. 2d 391, 14 Ill. Dec. 454, 1978 Ill. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-carey-v-dieringer-ill-1978.