People ex rel. Cantor v. County Board of Canvassers
This text of 170 A.D. 889 (People ex rel. Cantor v. County Board of Canvassers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is well settled that the court has no inherent power to review the action of the election officers or boards of canvassers, but before it can act must find authority to do so in the Election Law. (Matter of Tamney v. Atkins, 209 N. Y. 202.) We find no provision of law authorizing the court to vacate the certificates against which this motion was directed. The order should" be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the intervener, respondent, Isaac Siegel. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to intervenor.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cantor-v-county-board-of-canvassers-nyappdiv-1915.