People ex rel. Cantoni v. Artuz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Cantoni v. Artuz

240 A.D.2d 771, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7104

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered March 26, 1996, refusing to grant a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The appellant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered March 26, 1996, refusing to grant a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The appellant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Cantoni v. Artuz, 240 A.D.2d 771, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

240 A.D.2d 771 (People ex rel. Cantoni v. Artuz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related