People ex rel. Cantoni v. Artuz
This text of 240 A.D.2d 771 (People ex rel. Cantoni v. Artuz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered March 26, 1996, refusing to grant a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).
The appellant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D.2d 771, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cantoni-v-artuz-nyappdiv-1997.