People ex rel. Calixte v. Nassau County Dist. Attorney

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 6, 2026
Docket2025-15046
StatusPublished

This text of People ex rel. Calixte v. Nassau County Dist. Attorney (People ex rel. Calixte v. Nassau County Dist. Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Calixte v. Nassau County Dist. Attorney, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People ex rel. Calixte v Nassau County Dist. Attorney - 2026 NY Slip Op 02050

skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Court Decisions Resources About

People ex rel. Calixte v Nassau County Dist. Attorney

2026 NY Slip Op 02050

April 6, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Joseph L. Calixte, Jr., petitioner,

v

Nassau County District Attorney, et al., respondents.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on April 6, 2026

2025-15046

Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P.

Helen Voutsinas

Carl J. Landicino

Laurence L. Love, JJ.

Joseph L. Calixte, Jr., East Meadow, NY, petitioner pro se.

Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Paula Cajdler of counsel), respondent pro se.

[*1]

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Joseph L. Calixte, Jr., upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Nassau County Indictment No. 70090/2017.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230).

CHAMBERS, J.P., VOUTSINAS, LANDICINO and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI