People ex rel. Calderon v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Calderon v. Jackson

8 A.D.2d 878, 186 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8284

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 878 (People ex rel. Calderon v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Calderon v. Jackson, 8 A.D.2d 878, 186 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus. Substantially the same questions are advocated here that were decided by this [879]*879court iu the matter involving the same parties (People v. Calderone, 4 A D 2d 914) where the court held that habeas corpus is not a proper remedy. Order affirmed with the further statement that there is no merit to the contention of the defendant. The Bronx County Court had jurisdiction of the appellant and of the offense charged in the indictment and there was a proper compliance with the requirements of the various sections of the Penal Law and the Code of Criminal Procedure. Present — Poster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Gibson and Herlihy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus. Substantially the same questions are advocated here that were decided by this [879]*879court iu the matter involving the same parties (People v. Calderone, 4 A D 2d 914) where the court held that habeas corpus is not a proper remedy. Order affirmed with the further statement that there is no merit to the contention of the defendant. The Bronx County Court had jurisdiction of the appellant and of the offense charged in the indictment and there was a proper compliance with the requirements of the various sections of the Penal Law and the Code of Criminal Procedure. Present — Poster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Gibson and Herlihy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 878, 186 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-calderon-v-jackson-nyappdiv-1959.