People ex rel. Cahill v. Barker

5 A.D. 227, 39 N.Y.S. 140
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Williams, J. :

Article 10, section 3, of the Constitution, as it existed prior to 1894, and as it still exists, provides: When the duration of any [229] office is not provided by this Constitution it may be declared by law, and if not so declared, such office shall be held during the pleasure of the authority making the appointment.”

The duration of this office was not provided for by the Constitution, nor was it declared by the Consolidation Act or any other act of the Legislature.

The relator was not within any of the provisions of law limiting the power of removal, as in cases of the police force, heads of bureaus, clerks, veterans, etc.

We see no escape, therefore, from the conclusion that the respondents had the power to remove the relator from his office as assessor at their pleasure.

The writ should be dismissed.

Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, O’Brien and Ingraham, JJ., concurred.

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Cahill v. Barker, 5 A.D. 227, 39 N.Y.S. 140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

5 A.D. 227 (People ex rel. Cahill v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bornstein v. Freeman
1 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Bank of Malden v. Wayne Heading Co.
200 S.W. 693 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1918)
Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Wills
212 F. 688 (Seventh Circuit, 1914)
People ex rel. Bowers v. Dalton
23 Misc. 294 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)