People ex rel. Burns v. Lyons

266 A.D. 1053, 44 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5907
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 1943·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: The State Civil Service Commission, at the request of appellant, certified the names of three guards for promotion to the position of sergeant in their graded order, namely: (1) Wilkins, (2) Burns (petitioner-respondent) and (3) Johnson. All had passed competitive civil service examinations for the position and had [1054] claimed and received a preference as disabled war veterans (Civil Service Law, § 21; Rules for Classified Civil Service, rule XI, subd. 1). We think that subdivision 2 of rule VIII, applied, and gave to appellant the right to select any one of these three disabled veterans and that the appointment of Johnson was valid. All concur. (The order directs defendant to appoint petitioner to the rank of sergeant in the Department of Correction.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Burns v. Lyons, 266 A.D. 1053, 44 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

266 A.D. 1053 (People ex rel. Burns v. Lyons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nathanson v. Adams
207 Misc. 572 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Lustig v. Conway
195 Misc. 889 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)