People ex rel. Burke v. Smith

74 A.D.2d 725, 425 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10414

This text of 74 A.D.2d 725 (People ex rel. Burke v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Burke v. Smith, 74 A.D.2d 725, 425 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with Special Term that relator was not deprived of a prompt revocation hearing. Since Special Term’s decision we have held that both the "reasonable time” requirement of former subdivision 7 of section 212 of the Correction Law and the requirement in section 259-i (subd 3, par [f], cl [i]) of the Executive Law that parole revocation hearings be held within 90 days of the probable cause determination are subject to the limitation that the parolee must be subject to the convenience and practical control of the [726]*726Parole Board (People ex rel. Spinks v Dillon, 68 AD2d 368, app dsmd 48 NY2d 1025; see People ex rel. Walsh v Vincent, 40 NY2d 1049). (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming Supreme Court — habeas corpus.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Walsh v. Vincent
360 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People ex rel. Spinks v. Dillon
402 N.E.2d 142 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People ex rel. Spinks v. Dillon
68 A.D.2d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D.2d 725, 425 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-burke-v-smith-nyappdiv-1980.