People ex rel. Burke-Meyer Realty Corp. v. Sexton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Burke-Meyer Realty Corp. v. Sexton

254 A.D. 781, 4 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 781 (People ex rel. Burke-Meyer Realty Corp. v. Sexton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Burke-Meyer Realty Corp. v. Sexton, 254 A.D. 781, 4 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order confirming assessment and dismissing writ of certiorari in a proceeding to review the reasonableness of an assessment made the 1st day of October, 1931, unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. It was competent for respondents to prove that relator had made application for extension of mortgage. Such application implied that the property was worth fifty per cent more than the [782]*782amount of such mortgage. In the light of this and the rest of respondents’ proof, the admission of the alleged appraisal of the mortgage company was not substantial error. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order confirming assessment and dismissing writ of certiorari in a proceeding to review the reasonableness of an assessment made the 1st day of October, 1931, unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. It was competent for respondents to prove that relator had made application for extension of mortgage. Such application implied that the property was worth fifty per cent more than the [782]*782amount of such mortgage. In the light of this and the rest of respondents’ proof, the admission of the alleged appraisal of the mortgage company was not substantial error. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 781, 4 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-burke-meyer-realty-corp-v-sexton-nyappdiv-1938.