People ex rel. Burkardt v. Elsaesser

244 A.D. 891
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. Memo • randum: The record shows no jurisdictional defect in the commitment inasmuch as the relator was present in person before the court and pleaded guilty and thus waived any irregularity antecedent thereto. (City of Buffalo v. Neubeck, 209 App. Div. 386; Matter of Blum, 9 Misc. 571; People v. Park, 92 id. 369; People ex rel. Wojek v. Henderson, 134 id. 228.) There can be no question of the court’s jurisdiction of the subject-matter. All concur. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus.) Present —■ Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Burkardt v. Elsaesser, 244 A.D. 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

244 A.D. 891 (People ex rel. Burkardt v. Elsaesser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Smoake v. Morrow
58 Misc. 2d 266 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
People v. Carney
37 Misc. 2d 531 (New York County Courts, 1962)
People v. Madnick
28 Misc. 2d 850 (New York County Courts, 1960)
People v. Scott
143 N.E.2d 901 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
People ex rel. Travis v. Daniels
182 Misc. 856 (New York County Courts, 1943)