People ex rel. Bullock v. Davis

98 A.D.3d 992, 950 N.Y.S.2d 576

Opinion

— Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Queens County indictment No. 3105/10, and application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the fil[993]*993ing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Dickerson, J.P., Leventhal, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Bullock v. Davis, 98 A.D.3d 992, 950 N.Y.S.2d 576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

98 A.D.3d 992 (People ex rel. Bullock v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)