People ex rel. Buchanan v. Brophy

240 A.D. 864

This text of 240 A.D. 864 (People ex rel. Buchanan v. Brophy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Buchanan v. Brophy, 240 A.D. 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Order affirmed. The ten-year sentence for the crime of burglary, third degree, is a legal sentence and the term of the sentence has not yet expired. The relator is properly held in custody under the terms of this sentence. We are, therefore, not called upon to, and do not, pass upon the legality of the sentence of ten years for grand larceny, second degree (commuted to five years by the Governor), because the relator is not now in custody by reason of such sentence. We, therefore, express no opinion as to the legality of that sentence. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1252, subd. 2.) All concur; Edgcomb, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-buchanan-v-brophy-nyappdiv-1933.