People ex rel. Bruno v. Maudlin

123 Misc. 906, 206 N.Y.S. 523, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1221
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Taylor, J.

The authority holding unconstitutional section 618b of the Code of Criminal Procedure (People ex rel. Maloney v. Sheriff, 117 Misc. Rep. 421) is in effect overruled by the determination of the Appellate Division, first department, in a case in which no opinion was handed down. See cases and points in People ex rel. Farina v. Wallis, 208 App. Div. 720. Therefore, the statute in question is constitutional. The warrant of commitment is, therefore, valid on its face. The stenographer’s minutes of the hearing before the learned county judge show facts before him warranting his determination resulting in the commitment.

Writ of habeas corpus is dismissed and said Rose Bruno is remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Bruno v. Maudlin, 123 Misc. 906, 206 N.Y.S. 523, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1221 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1924).

123 Misc. 906 (People ex rel. Bruno v. Maudlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Ditchik v. Sheriff of County of Kings
171 Misc. 248 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)