People ex rel. Brundage v. Scannell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Brundage v. Scannell

79 N.Y.S. 1142

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1902·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In regard to those appeals which the corporation counsel can distinguish from the case already determined by the court of appeals, we think that the motion to dismiss the appeals should be denied, on such terms as may be just, and the city allowed to bring the cases to argument. As to the other cases, however, which at the last hearing he conceded to be indistinguishable, we think the appeals ought to be dismissed. Counsel may attend before this court on Tuesday, December 9th, at 11 a. m., for settlement of the order in accordance with this memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In regard to those appeals which the corporation counsel can distinguish from the case already determined by the court of appeals, we think that the motion to dismiss the appeals should be denied, on such terms as may be just, and the city allowed to bring the cases to argument. As to the other cases, however, which at the last hearing he conceded to be indistinguishable, we think the appeals ought to be dismissed. Counsel may attend before this court on Tuesday, December 9th, at 11 a. m., for settlement of the order in accordance with this memorandum.

People ex rel. Brundage v. Scannell, 79 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

79 N.Y.S. 1142 (People ex rel. Brundage v. Scannell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.