People ex rel. Brooklyn Paramount Corp. v. Sexton

255 A.D. 1011, 8 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6260
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order adjudging appellants in contempt for failure to file a return to a writ of certiorari, and order denying appellants’ motion to quash the writ on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction, affirmed, without costs. Appellants may purge themselves of the contempt by filing and serving a certified return of their proceedings within sixty days from the entry of the order hereon. The application does not adequately set forth the ground of objection to the assessment and, in our opinion, would be insufficient to entitle the applicant to a hearing if the board objected; but the application having been heard and a decision made thereon, it must be held that the inadequacy of the application has been waived. Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Brooklyn Paramount Corp. v. Sexton, 255 A.D. 1011, 8 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 1011 (People ex rel. Brooklyn Paramount Corp. v. Sexton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Irving Trust Co. v. Miller
264 A.D. 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)