People ex rel. Bridges v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Bridges v. Smith

105 A.D.2d 1142, 482 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21245

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 7, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: To the extent that relator admitted at the hearing that he did not stand for the count, the judgment is affirmed. Inasmuch as the remaining charges were based solely upon the written misbehavior report prepared by the correction officer, they must be dismissed as there is no substantial evidence to support them (see People ex rel. Corcoran v Smith, 105 AD2d 1142). The matter is converted from a habeas corpus proceeding to a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see People ex rel. Corcoran v Smith, supra) and is remitted to respondent for reconsideration of the penalty to be imposed on the admitted charge (see Matter of Jennings v Coughlin, 99 AD2d 635). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — habeas corpus.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: To the extent that relator admitted at the hearing that he did not stand for the count, the judgment is affirmed. Inasmuch as the remaining charges were based solely upon the written misbehavior report prepared by the correction officer, they must be dismissed as there is no substantial evidence to support them (see People ex rel. Corcoran v Smith, 105 AD2d 1142). The matter is converted from a habeas corpus proceeding to a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see People ex rel. Corcoran v Smith, supra) and is remitted to respondent for reconsideration of the penalty to be imposed on the admitted charge (see Matter of Jennings v Coughlin, 99 AD2d 635). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — habeas corpus.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

People ex rel. Bridges v. Smith, 105 A.D.2d 1142, 482 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

105 A.D.2d 1142 (People ex rel. Bridges v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related