People ex rel. Bridges v. Smith

105 A.D.2d 1142, 482 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21245
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 A.D.2d 1142 (People ex rel. Bridges v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Bridges v. Smith, 105 A.D.2d 1142, 482 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: To the extent that relator admitted at the hearing that he did not stand for the count, the judgment is affirmed. Inasmuch as the remaining charges were based solely upon the written misbehavior report prepared by the correction officer, they must be dismissed as there is no substantial evidence to support them (see People ex rel. Corcoran v Smith, 105 AD2d 1142). The matter is converted from a habeas corpus proceeding to a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see People ex rel. Corcoran v Smith, supra) and is remitted to respondent for reconsideration of the penalty to be imposed on the admitted charge (see Matter of Jennings v Coughlin, 99 AD2d 635). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — habeas corpus.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matthews v. Kelly
119 A.D.2d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A.D.2d 1142, 482 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bridges-v-smith-nyappdiv-1984.