People ex rel. Brady v. Hogan

166 A.D. 895

Opinion

Order reversed, and motion for a. peremptory writ of mandamus denied, as matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion, on authority of People ex rel. Deitz v. Hogan (165 App. Div. 298), decided herewith. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Brady v. Hogan, 166 A.D. 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

166 A.D. 895 (People ex rel. Brady v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Deitz v. Hogan
165 A.D. 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)